"Prolonging the In-between"
Stuck in your own limbo, but happy where you are
A job that pays the bills and keeps gas in your car.
Your young days are long over, but adulthood hasn’t arrived
Prolonging the In-between is where you found you thrived.
No marriage and no kids; haven’t gone to school for years
Watching all your silly peers stress over their careers
Staying where you are, avoiding most of “the next big step”
The contrivance of it all seems to be only for an artificial rep.
And that’s all fine, if it’s even true; it’s a luxury to live and whine
You just want to be happy, and the In-Between seems fine.
(Starring Andreas Zeichenwege from Zeichenwege.tumblr.com! Check out his great illustrations and comics)
new undies: cute
stretchmarks: also cute
No no no and NO stretch marks are never cute!! wtf too lazy to go get some cocoa butter and use it daily? We all have stretch marks but we can get rid of it.. People should take care of themselves and if cocoa butter didnt work for you make an appointment for a laser stretch mark removal dont be a lazy ass
hey quick question: what’s your fuckin damage
all stretch marks are beautiful no exceptions
- stretch marks are perfectly fine and natural and beautiful, free lightning bolt tattoos yo
- cocoa butter is a preventative that does not always work, and smells and stains clothes and oh yeah, since a lot of people get stretch marks just from growing NOT from weight, theyd have to slather their whole body and no one really wants to do that or smell like that so strongly.
- laser treatment? really? you want people to pay $1000+/appt (usually takes a few treatments) to get rid of something perfectly natural because you’ve named yourself standard of the fucking world and think we all live to please you? most people dont have that money and if they do thats not what they want to spend it on.
- also fuck you.
I usually don’t reblog ladies in undies, but for real. Don’t fuckin’ knock people over stretchmarks, or anything on their bodies for that matter. I’ve been underweight all my life and have them from growing. They happen. The just do.
FREE LIGHTNING TATTOOS
MOST UNDERRATED MOVIE QUOTE EVER
[Mary Shelley] said, ‘That’s not so ignorant after all. There are two monsters in my story, not one. And one of them, the scientist, is indeed named Frankenstein.’
God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian.
Wendy Kozma was wrapping up her workday with a client when she got a mind-numbing phone call from her mentally disabled daughter: “Mom, this man is trying to take me from Wal-Mart.”
Kozma feared the worst: a kidnapping.
Within minutes, she would learn what was really happening. Her 25-year-old daughter, Jodi, was being questioned for shoplifting at a Livonia Wal-Mart. Jodi was suspected of stealing hair ties and hiding them in her waistband and purse during a shopping trip with her grandmother, records show.
Jodi wound up in handcuffs, muscled to the floor by Livonia police.
Wal-Mart and the Livonia police wound up in court.
Turned out, Jodi had bought a 30-pack of hair ties and stickers that day, and has a receipt as proof. The suspicious bulge in her waistband was her cellphone.
In a civil rights lawsuit unfolding in U.S. District Court, Wendy and John Kozma of Novi are suing the retail giant and Livonia police, alleging they used excessive force on their daughter and scarred her emotionally. Jodi grew up learning to trust the cops, her mother said. Now, she’s terrified of them.
“If she were ever lost or stranded, we always taught her to turn and look for police. All of that has been completely destroyed,” Wendy Kozma said in an interview with the Free Press. “I know that this has traumatized her. I want it to go away.”
It has been nearly two years since Jodi was arrested at the Livonia Wal-Mart, but her parents still are reeling. They want an apology from Wal-Mart and Livonia police, who, records show, dispatched four officers to the scene that day “in a SWAT-like approach, parking the cruisers on the sidewalk directly in front of the store doors.”
Among the lawsuit’s claims is that store security and police were repeatedly told by family that Jodi was “special needs,” but failed to treat her accordingly and instead traumatized her when she didn’t have the mental capacity to understand what was going on.
Jodi just wants an apology — and a bouquet of flowers. That’s what apologetic people do in the movies, she told her parents.
The parents want an apology, too, along with unspecified financial damages and assurance that police and store security follow proper procedures when dealing with disabled people.
The Kozmas filed their lawsuit in May in Wayne County Circuit Court, but Wal-Mart requested on June 9 that the case be moved to federal court. Initially, the Kozmas filed a citizen’s complaint with the Livonia police department, alleging officers used excessive force on their daughter and were unprofessional. They filed it the same day of the incident: Aug. 3, 2012.
Livonia police declined to comment. But according to a letter they sent the Kozmas, they deny any wrongdoing.
“In order to make the situation safe for all parties involved, the decision was made to handcuff your daughter, who was initially compliant, but then began to struggle. Officers used the minimal amount of force necessary to gain control and handcuff her. There was no indication that your daughter was injured when she was detained,” Livonia Police Lt. Francis Donnelly wrote in the Sept. 18, 2012, letter. “I have reviewed both video and audio recordings of the incident and find no evidence of unprofessional behavior or excessive force on the part of our officers. Based on my investigation, I have determined that your complaint against our officers is unfounded.”
Wal-Mart, which declined to comment on specifics of the lawsuit, issued this statement: “First and foremost, a cornerstone at Wal-Mart is respect for an individual. We expect all of our customers to be treated with dignity and respect, regardless of the situation. Based on the information that we have (about the Kozma case), we believe our associates acted appropriately and followed protocol.”
Wendy Kozma tells a different story.
Here, according to Kozma, a police incident report and surveillance video obtained by the Free Press, is what happened that day:
Jodi, who was born with a condition that deprived her brain of oxygen and left her mentally disabled, had gone on a shopping trip to Wal-Mart with her grandmother. After checking out, two plainclothes Wal-Mart security officers surrounded Jodi in the lobby and accused her of stealing merchandise.
Unbeknownst to Jodi, she was being monitored in the store by a surveillance camera operator who said she had footage of Jodi picking up hair pieces and concealing them in her purse or in her waistband.
When store security stopped Jodi, she became afraid and upset. The grandmother informed the security team that Jodi is mentally disabled and would not intentionally steal. She tried to show them the receipt for the hair ties her granddaughter had purchased, but the security team wouldn’t listen to her. And they wouldn’t let her calm her granddaughter down. Jodi, meanwhile, had called her mom, who immediately headed for Wal-Mart. By the time her mom arrived, police were there.
According to a police incident report, Jodi was screaming “at the top of her lungs, causing a scene.” A sergeant asked Jodi to put her hands behind her back because he could not confirm if a bulge in her waistband was a weapon, a cellphone or stolen merchandise. Then came the handcuffs. Jodi pulled away and began screaming, reaching for her grandmother. She was placed against a wall. Two officers “muscled Jody to the ground and handcuffed her behind her back,” the report said. They took her to a private office and started questioning her.
She repeatedly denied stealing anything.
Within minutes, her mom showed up. She tried to enter the interrogation room, but police stopped her. After pleading and threatening a lawsuit, she got in. The image of her catatonic, handcuffed daughter broke her heart.
“I said, ‘Jodi, It’s OK. Mom’s here,’ ” Kozma recalled through tears, noting her daughter assured her she was fine. “She said, ‘That’s OK. God is with me.’ … I believe that God was with her and kept her calm.”
During questioning, an officer threatened to conduct a body search, but Kozma intervened and searched her daughter herself. She lifted her shirt, her pant legs and opened her waistband. Nothing was found. She emptied the contents of her purse. No stolen goods were inside.
The police let her go.
A bigger problem?
Jodi left the store, tears streaming down her face. She has not been to a Wal-Mart since. And she gets frazzled when she sees Wal-Mart TV commercials, or a Wal-Mart truck on the highway.
“How did it get to that?” said a frustrated Kozma, who believes Wal-Mart and police escalated the situation by not letting Jodi calm down and handcuffing her.
Prominent plaintiff’s attorney Deborah Gordon, who is representing the Kozmas, agreed, saying Wal-Mart and police “over-reacted in a goonish way.”
“We’re not talking about a (stolen) gun or a plasma TV or cash. We’re talking hair ties. And it turned out she didn’t have anything,” Gordon said. “Instead of everybody taking a deep breath and telling the grandmother, ‘Would you mind sitting in a chair here and wait for her mom,’ they’ve gotta do their ramped-up Rambo crap.”
Gordon said the case highlights an all-too-common problem with police authorities: a lack of procedures in place to deal with people with disabilities.
“Everybody who has a child who is compromised relates totally to how out-of-control this can get,” said Gordon. “They wouldn’t let the mother in? Why?”
Kozma, meanwhile wants assurance from police that this doesn’t happen to anyone ever again. And, she added: “I want them to go a step further and say, ‘We were wrong.’ ”